IF FIREARM OWNERSHIP WAS BANNED IN 1787, HOW WOULD THAT HAVE IMPACTED THE CIVIL WAR?

In 1787 the United States Constitution was officially ratified. For the sake of an interesting blog, let’s assume that all the states agreed to ban the ownership of firearms by civilians. Instead numerous “Militia Stations” were established throughout the states where firearms were held in a secure armory available for times of war.

 

The presumption being that the state of war would come about because of invasion by a foreign foe or our troops invading a foreign foe themselves. Many constitutional ventriloquist’s claim that this sacred document, in its Bill of Rights, permits the keeping and bearing of arms only by official state militias, as opposed to individual citizens.

 

Now the notion of the citizens, the pioneers, the hunters & trappers and people just living in rural settings not having firearms is not only hard to imagine, it is also an impossibility.

 

It leads me to thinking that the possession of firearms is seen in two very different ways, one being the essential need of firearms for very practical reasons applicable earlier in the history of our country and the possession of firearms in the modern era where there is little or no risk of being mauled by a bear nor much need to hunt elk for food.

 

But rather than digress into that, let’s stick with the original premise. In this scenario, there would be a ready source of presumably modern weapons housed in the numerous militia stations located throughout the states, including the southern states.

 

In truth, there were many United States military installations in the South. There were many seaport forts such as Fort Sumter and there were forts in the interior. Just as was the case in the Civil War, the local officials would seize these resources at the onset of the war.

 

The same would be the case with militia stations. As the real war began, we saw the first strike being made against Fort Sumter at Charleston. In my scenario, added to the attack on Sumter would be numerous local assaults against the militia stations. Some would resist mightily and in other cases the guards would quietly disappear at night.

 

So I guess this premise boils down to the question, how good were the weapons owned by the citizens in the South and to what extent were those weapons used in the war? We do know that early in the war southern boys showed up to muster with everything from bird guns to squirrel guns and many Revolutionary war era converted Flintlock’s. Smooth bore one and all.

 

The Confederate government and its military leadership worked very hard to get better weapons into the hands of the troops and while the South would never have large quantities of the best and latest weapons, the troops were armed with weaponry that was generally a fair match to that which they faced, although there are many exceptions to this.

 

Many of us feel that the federal government’s discomfort with an armed citizenry, that belief being shared by progressive Americans, is associated with the threat of a tyrannical government would face from an armed citizenry challenging its misconduct.

 

I believe that this is the core motivation for those who seek to disarm the people. But as we consider the effect of this disarmament and look at the Civil War through that prism, we see that that a disarmed citizenry has very little effect on a region’s ability to resist federal duress….at least after a while.

 

While our modern shotguns, high precision deer rifles and good-quality pistols are far better weapons than what the citizenry possessed 150 years ago, they still aren’t really the right weapons for war. I think the same scramble for better and more appropriate weapons would occur today as was the case back then.

 

Unless all of the forts, National Guard Armory’s and other repositories of military weaponry are able to resist those who would abandon their posts and a rebellious citizenry bent on overwhelming and seizing an armory, then disarming the citizenry would have had little benefit in terms of protecting the federal government from its own citizens.

 

 

Advertisements

How the Confederate Chronicles Got Started

From the moment of my first encounter with Confederate Cavalry Reenactors, I have wondered what would happen if they got loose in the countryside in today’s world.

A company of Confederate Cavalry, equipped as they were during the war, under active operation while being pursued by the authorities.

Would they be crushed almost instantly by Police SWAT teams, ATF tactical teams, National Guard in helicopter gunships. Would it end up being awkward and pathetic or would men on horseback with guns still be a force to be reckoned with?

With that core idea in mind, I began to imagine how such a circumstance could occur. When you recall that the South was a separate country for nearly 5 years, you notice its absence.

A living breathing country that provided for the common defense, operated a Diplomatic Corps, a Treasury that printed currency, a Postal Service all founded on a Constitution virtually identical to the one at the archives in Washington DC.

When you think of the South during the war, mostly you think about the war. When you think about the war, you think about the battles and the generals and the outcomes. During all that, there was a country inhabited by people virtually identical in thinking, dress, religion and sense of patriotism as those left behind in the United States of America.

It all came and went quickly, in the scheme of things. Beyond waging war, there was so much that the government did associated with looking out for the people of the country. It worked to ensure a safe, fair and functional homeland.

It’s that functioning homeland that I “wish” to still exist, anonymously. Always in the background, looking out for the citizens. The scale of their continued presence would have to be small for reasons of likelihood and for the sake of their being able to continue to remain anonymous.

Smaller is always better when it comes to government and in my book – Ghost of a Chance – the still existing Confederate government is able to affect good works in very targeted ways without having to encounter the usual governmental inefficiencies associated with having a legislature and the usual complex pre-existing laws and procedures to be observed.

In my book, if the Hamilton’s ancient family farm is about to be auctioned in Chesterfield County Virginia – home to seven generations of Hamilton’s – the funds get wired to the auctioneer the day before the auction and just two days after the cabinet of the Confederate government was made aware of the need.

Once I developed the idea of a still functioning Confederate Government, working up a conflict between it and the Federal Government of the United States…well it just came naturally!

Confederate graves vandalized in Raleigh

Just one day into the New Year vandals desecrated numerous Confederate graves and monuments with spray paint in Raleigh’s historic Oakwood Cemetery. From tiny markers for privates, to headstones for old generals and from a large obelisk to an entire military unit, to a special bronze plaque for the lost crew of the pioneering submarine Hunley, all were defaced.

The villains involved seem to suffer from a high degree of cowardice, given the fact that they only felt safe attacking those long dead and at night. What great warriors for freedom are these maladroit mice.

The death of a single man can be a terrible thing. In my opinion, history and historic relics are man’s nearest form of immortality. Perhaps destroying history is akin to killing a man all over again or even an entire civilization.

I suspect the vandals involved do not realize that they are but a branch on the tree called ISIS. The ISIS people are bit more professional and tend to use high explosives in their efforts to destroy human history, but these vandals and ISIS are, ultimately, one and the same.

They say that history can be our greatest teacher. If this is true, historic things must be preserved in their purest form, entirely consistent with the era they are associated with. Otherwise, the lessons will not be as strong as they may need to be and if we choose to eliminate history that we do not approve of, then there will be nothing to learn from.

Implied in the vandalism, I suppose, is the notion that all monuments, historic buildings, headstones, battlefields and other relics of the past must constantly be corrected through elimination or destruction so as to be consistent with the current days political and moral philosophies.

Ironically, the history the vandals seek to destroy, won’t then be available to help support their claims, perspectives and to remind us of those wrongs, if they are wrongs. This is why concentration camps are so carefully preserved and why the Germans worked so desperately to destroy them at war’s end.

Clearly, morality does evolve and 150 years ago in many places in this country and around the world, slavery was considered acceptable. Today we breed, raise and slaughter all varieties of livestock with virtually none of us giving it a second thought. It is as things have always been. However, any pet owner will insist that their beloved companion exhibits deep and complex indications of personality, loyalty and intelligence.

Perhaps 150 years from now we will knock over Frank Perdue’s gravestone and vilify anyone who has accepted support from the charitable Perdue foundation…

I was watching Ken Burns’s Civil War series the other night, sharing it with my young son for the first time. I was again taken aback by the notion of treating human beings from Africa as if they were purely animals.

The idea that this had been the case as recently as 150 years ago and that it has taken another 100 years since then to almost entirely erase such beliefs is a very uncomfortable truth. Were only it 1,000 years ago.

Let us talk, let us debate, let us read and ponder, but leave the old markers alone for they have value. They are teaching touch points, they are road signs that mark our pathway through time.

It all reminds me of an ironic truth that I feel I can spot around the world and through time. The downtrodden, the enslaved, the horrifically wronged all become strong one day. However, so often when they have obtained the power to smite those who had wronged them, those prior villains are no longer with us and there is no one left to punish.

 How to best deal with that unfulfilled quest and hunger and appetite for revenge is a great question.

The Confederate Chronicles Blog

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 4.10.36 PM

Hi, and welcome!  My name is Boyd Parker, author of The Confederate Chronicles. I’m so happy to have you as a visitor to my blog about my new book.  This project is very special to me, and I hope to share some of that excitement with you here.

I’ll be using this blog to interact with you about The Confederate Chronicles, expanding on some of the topics in it and posting on some of the ideas related to my book.  This is a great place for you to get to know me, and I’m looking forward to getting to know you, too.

What did you think of my new book?  What questions do you have for me?  How do you relate to my book?

I’ll be returning here frequently with new posts and responses to feedback from you.

Until next time, please tell me a little bit about yourself.  Thank you!